Compare Microsoft MDS vs. Semarchy xDM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft MDS Logo
6,643 views|2,937 comparisons
Semarchy xDM Logo
1,721 views|1,079 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, SAP and others in Master Data Management. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Technical support is very good.""The most valuable feature is the administration console.""It is very easy to deploy and provision a machine.""What I like about Microsoft, is that it has a huge database with many users.""Its availability for a secured server is one of its most valuable features. Also its replications - we can manage eight replicas. Their clustering and availability groups are also valuable.""It has a very good feature called Excel plug-in. You just have to install the plug-in, and then it directly connects to the MDS instance where you can maintain and manage your data and publish it right through Excel. You don't need to go to the front end to make any changes. It has easy integration with SQL Server, and you can use SSIS to do the ETLs. It is a part of the Microsoft stack. It works with most of the Microsoft stuff.""It's very easy to use.""One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."

More Microsoft MDS Pros »

"Their documentation is excellent."

More Semarchy xDM Pros »

Cons
"The solution could be better integrated into Microsoft's other products.""In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure.""Most of the Microsoft partners, especially digitally, are separate. Personnel are business people, and they do not have technical expertise, so you end up as a company spending a lot of money training your staff and your engineers.""They do not offer the SQL Server Management tool via the installation. It is a separate tool I use when I'm trying to configure the mirroring with SQL Server Mirroring. This is not supported and I'm getting some errors on the database mirroring.""The only drawback is that it does not have the matching, merging, and all true MDM components. For these, you have to use another competent called Data Quality Services (DQS). You need to plug it in and use it along with MDS for true MDM. Both of these are integrated together, but you have to do them separately, whereas, in Profisee, there are a couple of screens where you can configure the matching process, create matching rules, and other things, and everything is in one product, which is not the case with MDS. In order to implement a true MDM, you need MDS, DQS, and SSIS. You have to use MDS to store your golden records, DQS to configure and standardize all your rules and matching percentages, and SSIS to load the data to DQS and MDS. At the same time, you also need Melissa Data to clean up your addresses to validate and standardize the addresses. That's the main component of true MDM. It would be good if they can create a true matching component inside MDS and merge MDS and DQS.""It would be a better option to have an on-cloud version.""I do not like using Silverlight and Internet Explorer. The new 2019 version gets rid of that, which is one of the reasons why we are looking to switch."

More Microsoft MDS Cons »

"They need to make the workflow more enhanced or dynamic in its functionality."

More Semarchy xDM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing of this solution is good.""With Microsoft, we buy everything though an agreement, so we purchase volume licensing every year.""I would like to see better pricing.""MDS is a part of the SQL Server enterprise license. I am not aware of any additional costs.""SAP is more expensive than Microsoft.""The solution does require a license and we have enterprise licenses."

More Microsoft MDS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution does require a license and we have enterprise licenses.
Top Answer: The version that I work with is on-premises and it required an additional virtual machine on the cloud. It would be a better option to have an on-cloud version.
Top Answer: Their documentation is excellent.
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is excellent. It costs less than Informatica and Profisee.
Top Answer: They need to make the workflow more enhanced or dynamic in its functionality. That was the tiebreaker between Profisee and Semarchy - the client had a SQL server development environment and they could… more »
Ranking
2nd
Views
6,643
Comparisons
2,937
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
594
Rating
7.6
11th
Views
1,721
Comparisons
1,079
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,554
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Microsoft Master Data Services, Microsoft MDM, Microsoft SQL Server Master Data Services, MS MDS, MS MDS, MS MDS
Semarchy Intelligent MDM
Learn More
Overview

Master Data Services (MDS) is the SQL Server solution for master data management. Master data management (MDM) describes the efforts made by an organization to discover and define non-transactional lists of data, with the goal of compiling maintainable master lists. An MDM project generally includes an evaluation and restructuring of internal business processes along with the implementation of MDM technology. The result of a successful MDM solution is reliable, centralized data that can be analyzed, resulting in better business decisions.

Semarchy is the Intelligent MDM company. Its xDM platform is an innovation in multi-vector Master Data Management (MDM) that leverages smart algorithms and material design to simplify data stewardship, governance, and integration. It is implemented via an agile and iterative approach that delivers business value almost immediately and scales to meet enterprise complexity.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft MDS
Learn more about Semarchy xDM
Sample Customers
ETA a.s., Apeejay Surrendra Group, Blue Star Infotech, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation, The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, New Belgium Brewing
DiamondStream, Oakley, Araymond, EBU/Eurovision, Groupe Roullier, BOSE, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Putnam Investments, BAE Systems, Mundi Pharma, Merck, Elsevier, CMA CGM
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Insurance Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise62%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, SAP and others in Master Data Management. Updated: June 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Microsoft MDS is ranked 2nd in Master Data Management with 9 reviews while Semarchy xDM is ranked 11th in Master Data Management with 1 review. Microsoft MDS is rated 7.6, while Semarchy xDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft MDS writes "MDS 2016 - Bit clunky but it works and the price is right and easy to get setup ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Semarchy xDM writes "Great user interface, very good documentation, and offers excellent pricing". Microsoft MDS is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, Reltio Cloud and TIBCO EBX, whereas Semarchy xDM is most compared with Informatica MDM, Profisee, TIBCO EBX, Informatica PIM and Reltio Cloud.

See our list of best Master Data Management vendors and best Cloud Master Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Master Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.