We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"The tool offers a lot of support, and there is a lot of knowledge material available, along with a lot of community groups."
"If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"-"
"Nginx is simple to configure, very stable in a highly utilized environment and very modular, allowing DevOps to create it's own modules for interactive use with Nginx."
"NGINX Plus' most valuable feature is the ingress controller."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is simple to configure."
"With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."
"The flexibility of its modules allow it to be scalable."
"When you use NGINX, you have more options and power."
"The load balancing module, which is equivalent to LTM, is the focus of the PSE. So far, the features of both are identical. I believe NGINX has more features for securing these services, but in terms of load balancing, both are massive solutions."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"The product’s reliability needs improvement."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source."
"I would like to see the Grafana integration in NGINX which is already present in HAProxy. Grafana integration will help the solution visualize all the data analytics on the dashboard which is currently not present."
"The solution's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The center management system could be improved."
"I would like it to have a more user-friendly graphical interface."
"They should do in the open source version of what they did to Advanced HTTP, TCP, and UDP load balancing."
"The drawback is that you must obtain a license for everything."
"Make modules easier to enable or disable. The beauty and ugly side of the NGINX modules is you have to know how to compile the module. For beginners or non-very technical aspirant(s) going for NGINX, they have to learn how to compile the modules."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while NGINX Plus is ranked 2nd in Application Infrastructure with 27 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while NGINX Plus is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Uniface, whereas NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. NGINX Plus report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
