Compare Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics

Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 5th in Application Infrastructure with 8 reviews while Zenoss Service Dynamics is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.8, while Zenoss Service Dynamics is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Has improved our efficiency in the time it takes to program a solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zenoss Service Dynamics writes "Custom built integration feature enables you to see the especially critical items". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, IBM WebSphere Application Server and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, whereas Zenoss Service Dynamics is most compared with Zabbix, Splunk and PRTG Network Monitor. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process.When it comes to the user interface, the context is better than other tools because it is easier to use.The most valuable feature is the financial accounting.The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS.The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager.A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily.Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available.The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism.The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items.

Read more »

Cons
If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful.They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers.This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools.I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it.Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement.It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux.Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues.

Read more »

The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement.There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There is a Community Edition that can be used free of charge, but the licensing cost for the Enterprise version is quite high.The pricing could be cheaper.The Microsoft .NET Framework is free of charge, without licensing cost.The product and support for this solution are free for everyone.Do your homework. Consider the partnership program.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,515
Comparisons
977
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
612
Avg. Rating
8.9
Views
4,015
Comparisons
3,022
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
435
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Learn
Microsoft
Zenoss
Overview
.NET Framework is a software framework that runs primarily on Microsoft Windows. It includes a large class library named Framework Class Library (FCL) and provides language interoperability across several programming languages. Programs written for .NET Framework execute in a software environment named Common Language Runtime (CLR), an application virtual machine that provides services such as security, memory management, and exception handling. FCL and CLR together constitute .NET Framework.

Zenoss Service Dynamics (ZSD) is a hybrid IT monitoring platform that allows enterprise companies to monitor everything, including compute, storage, network, converged infrastructure, applications and unified communications systems. Zenoss customers gain IT performance and risk insights into their unique IT ecosystems through real-time analytics that adapt to today's constantly changing data centers and cloud infrastructures, enabling them to eliminate disruptions and accelerate business outcomes.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft .NET Framework
Learn more about Zenoss Service Dynamics
Sample Customers
Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical Company2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Individual & Family Service11%
Media Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Zenoss Service Dynamics and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.