• Home
  • Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] vs. ReadyTalk

Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] vs ReadyTalk comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Featured Review
    Anonymous User
    It is user-friendly. Unskilled workers can use it comprehensively.
    It saves costs, time, and energy. It improves the relationship with my customers.
    Anonymous User
    ReadyTalk offers the right features, easy to use and stellar support
    Our webinar program was floundering. After I started working with ReadyTalk, we have been able to increase the number of webinars, These webinars... Read more →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    36th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    106
    Comparisons
    50
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office Communications Server, MS Office Communications Server [EOL]
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    ReadyTalk
    Overview

    Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 R2 Management API suite provides a set of Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) classes used to manage and support an Office Communications Server deployment, as well as any managed code and Microsoft SIP Processing Language applications installed on it. Office Communications Server offers a Standard Edition and an Enterprise Edition:

    • Standard Edition is designed for use in small or medium-sized organizations. Standard Edition is also recommended for organizations that do not require the performance, scalability, and high availability that Enterprise Edition provides.
    • Enterprise Edition is designed for large-scale deployments that are typical of large organizations. In an Enterprise Edition deployment, multiple Office Communications Server Enterprise Edition servers are deployed as a pool behind a load balancer. Servers in the pool share a central Microsoft SQL Server database that stores user data.
    ReadyTalk gives you everything that's been missing in online meetings and webinars. Easy-to-use platform delivers superior collaboration technology, supported by expert service you didn't think was possible. With ReadyTalk, you can be sure of foolproof web conferencing anyone can join anywhere, anytime. ReadyTalk gives you a simple, high-quality solution that works how you want it to _ backed by outstanding customer experiences every time. There's no software for users to download, and no worries that technology will ever get in the way of your meeting or presentation. You and your team can just focus on having an awesome business engagement every time.
    Sample Customers
    Aruba Networks, Senelec, QNet Limited, New Belgium Brewing Company, ETA a.s., YES Prep Public Schools, Del Monte Foods, CDW, Tieto Corporation
    Marketo, Attask, Profiles International
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit36%
    Educational Organization14%
    Marketing Services Firm14%
    Renewables & Environment Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business64%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise27%

    Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while ReadyTalk is ranked 36th in Virtual Meetings. Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] is rated 9.0, while ReadyTalk is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] writes "It is user-friendly. Unskilled workers can use it comprehensively". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyTalk writes "ReadyTalk offers the right features, easy to use and stellar support". Microsoft Office Communications Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ReadyTalk is most compared with .

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.