Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs XWiki SAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and XWiki SAS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
RicardoPedro
Use XWiki SAS?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month."
  • "There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider."
  • "Pricing plans may be flexible depending on volume usage and your corporate relationship with Microsoft."
  • "It can be expensive for on-premises deployments, especially when you have to support SQL Server as your backend database. That's where the cost comes into play. SQL Server has its own licensing, which Microsoft keeps on changing. Therefore, it can become costly. In the earlier versions of SharePoint, version 2007 or 2010, they had an express version where the SQL Server licensing was free. It wasn't like a full-blown SharePoint. It was only a slimmed-down version. It used to be whatever your hardware costs. You would install the free software and work with it, but you were very limited in what you could do in SharePoint. If you wanted the SharePoint Enterprise Server with all the bells and whistles, then you had to pay more to get the SQL Server license based on the number of users or servers. The subscription model is different for cloud deployments. Licensing is per user and per month. The cost also depends on the storage required. If you have a lot of sites or documents, then you need to expand it based on your needs."
  • More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    2,570
    Comparisons
    2,418
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    58
    Comparisons
    48
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Office SharePoint Server, MS Office SharePoint Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

    XWiki is a powerful Open Source knowledge management platform that helps businesses save time and budget while enhancing collaboration on both team and organizational levels. It allows users across different departments to stay on the same page by accessing critical information in a fast and efficient way. Email overload, the loss of important knowledge when key employees leave are long forgotten and silos are reduced. With XWiki, vital information is only a click away, training and operations costs are reduced and data loss is prevented through regular backups. 

    XWiki is developed thinking of extensibility, adaptability, and flexibility. It comes with over 750 apps and extensions and allows for endless customization. Moreover, App Within Minutes allows even non-technical users to create their own extensions to address specific needs with custom solutions and continue collaborating efficiently. Because every business is different, XWiki is available both on-premise and Cloud, and, since there is no vendor lock-in, switching between the two is possible at any time.

    Sample Customers
    Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, óxito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
    Amazon, Lenovo,  EMC, Cap Gemini, Crédit Mutuel Arkea, Brabantia, Électricité de France, Aelia, Energisa, Meetic, Chronopost. More references: http://www.xwiki.com/en/refere...
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while XWiki SAS is ranked 13th in Knowledge Management Software. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while XWiki SAS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HCL Connections, whereas XWiki SAS is most compared with Atlassian Confluence.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.