We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution."
"It handles high volumes of data very well."
"We are able to monitor daily jobs, so if there is anything that needs to be done then we can do it."
"The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature."
"It is a very stable database."
"Tools like the BI and SAS are excellent."
"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."
"Data modeling is a valuable feature."
"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."
"It is a robust system."
"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."
"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."
"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."
"A robust and efficient product."
"The query is slow if we don't optimize it."
"I would like the ability to do more real-time type updates instead of batch-oriented updates."
"I would like to see better visualization features."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"More tools to help designers should be included."
"The feature updates on the on-premise solution come very slowly, and it would be great if they came faster."
"We find the cost of the solution to be a little high."
"Concurrent queries are limited to 32, making it more of a data storage mechanism instead of an active DWH solution."
"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."
"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."
"The program is difficult to learn to use"
"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."
"Design and modeling could be simplified."
"The product could provide more features."
"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 8th in Data Warehouse with 12 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is ranked 14th in Data Warehouse with 3 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "User-friendly UI and good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse writes "Can transform data per clients' needs and can easily distribute reports to end users". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake and VMware Tanzu Greenplum, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is most compared with SAP BW4HANA and SAP Business Warehouse. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.