We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable and easy to expand."
"It can scale well."
"The most valuable features are the gantt charts. It's easy to use for me."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is stable to use, especially since I work with Microsoft for an extended period."
"The solution scales well."
"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."
"Microsoft Project Server is simple to use."
"The scheduling feature is the most useful."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"It may be considered expensive."
"In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket."
"Stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."
"The solution should be made more collaborative."
"EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available."
"Microsoft Project Server's user interface is pretty average, and sometimes it can have bugs."
"Project Server could be improved by simplifying how tasks are assigned and reviewed on a daily basis."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, JIRA Portfolio and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, EcoSys, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
