Microsoft Project Server vs Procore Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good.""The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well.""The solution has easy integration with Excel.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is stable to use, especially since I work with Microsoft for an extended period.""The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect.""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to understand and navigate.""It can scale well.""The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

More Procore Project Management Pros →

Cons
"The product's UI is not very user-friendly.""This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them.""There are certain shortcomings in the documentation part where improvements are required.""The solution should be made more collaborative.""It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else.""In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket.""I'd like it if we could divide out the project calendars. On one project server, we might follow five projects or more at one time, and we'd like to see all of the items at once so that it becomes a long loop, but one where we can identify different projects in tandem and then focus on which we need to at the time. While I only have visibility into one, I'd like to see several at a time.""The solution needs to be much more stable."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

More Procore Project Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
  • More Procore Project Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good.
    Top Answer:The product's UI is not very user-friendly. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to offer a user-friendly UI. Microsoft should attempt to match the capabilities offered by the other… more »
    Top Answer:The financial side of Procore Project Management is better.
    Top Answer:The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,330
    Comparisons
    1,140
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    7.5
    23rd
    Views
    410
    Comparisons
    357
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    204
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.

    Procore Technologies, Inc. provides cloud-based construction software to clients across the globe. Using its award-winning suite of project management tools, hundreds of thousands of registered Procore users manage all types of construction projects including industrial plants, office buildings, apartment complexes, university facilities, retail centers, and more.

    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Consigli,Doran,Harvey,HITT,Mortenson construction,Robins and Morton
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Retailer9%
    Construction Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Management Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 1 review. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Asana, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Planview PPM Pro and Meridian Proliance PPM.

    See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.