We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level."
"The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."
"It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications."
"The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time."
"SharePoint site integration"
"Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious."
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."
"The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use."
"The cost could be lower."
"It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The price of the product must be improved."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 25 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Complex and less user-friendly interface, frequent technical issues, and slower speed compared to other project management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.