Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level.""The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable.""The solution is stable.""The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning.""It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications.""The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time.""SharePoint site integration""Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.""I find Sciforma's customizability valuable.""It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

More Sciforma Pros →

Cons
"The price of the solution could be reduced.""The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious.""This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them.""The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use.""The cost could be lower.""It needs to be more collaborative from inside the application. It only does project scheduling for me. It would be good if it could do other things and be more collaborative, such as sharing tasks for users. It is not really incorporated into MS Office, so you can't copy-paste stuff. It is on its own, doing its own thing. It is only used for scheduling, and it doesn't work well with anything else.""The initial setup was complex.""The price of the product must be improved."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining.""For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources.""The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

More Sciforma Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."
  • "The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More Sciforma Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One notable positive aspect is its effective project-tracking capabilities.
    Top Answer:The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software.
    Top Answer:Remote usage and tracking pose challenges, requiring navigation through numerous technical details and troubleshooting. This inconvenience sometimes leads to abandoning the task on the device and… more »
    Top Answer:The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,330
    Comparisons
    1,140
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    242
    Comparisons
    206
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    552
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    One2team
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.
    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 25 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Complex and less user-friendly interface, frequent technical issues, and slower speed compared to other project management tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.