We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is on the expensive side."
"There is a licensing cost."
"There is an annual license required for this solution."
"I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
Earn 20 points
SoftExpert is a market leader in software and services for enterprise-wide business processes automation and improvement, compliance management and corporate governance, with more than 300,000 users from 2,000 organizations, operating in over 30 countries worldwide
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 4th in Project Portfolio Management with 11 reviews while SoftExpert PPM is ranked 30th in Project Portfolio Management. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while SoftExpert PPM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Planview Enterprise One, SAP Portfolio and Project Management and Jira, whereas SoftExpert PPM is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.