Microsoft Project Server vs Tempo Budget comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
2,226 views|1,085 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Tempo Logo
53 views|37 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Tempo Budget based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't cost for hardware but for other tools to use.
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,226
    Comparisons
    1,085
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    53
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.

    Tempo Budgets is financial project and portfolio management for SME's and large-scale enterprises implementing traditional or agile methodologies.

    See all your projects and portfolios are available in a powerful overview and manage in an agile manner. Only app for Jira that supports Earned Value Management.

    Manage project scope, schedule and costs efficiently in real-time. Roll-up data on the portfolio level.

    Try for free and see why more than 20,000 customers, including 120 of the Global 500, use Tempo.

    Highlights:

    - Complete, real-time visualization of project and portfolio health with project cost and revenue overviews
    - Earned Value Management (EVM) or traditional reporting
    - Budget baseline labelling and versioning
    - Planned vs actual financials and forecasts
    - Manage staff allocation, capacity and workload
    - Manage wages, cost rates & overtime pay
    - Enterprise features (data visibility control, Jira Data Center compatible, API)
    - Tempo Timesheets integration

    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Portfolio Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Tempo Budget is ranked 26th in Project Portfolio Management. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Tempo Budget is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Tempo Budget is most compared with .

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.