Compare Microsoft Project Server vs. Workfront
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 5 reviews while Workfront is ranked 15th in Project Management Software. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Workfront is rated 0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "The division between the onsite work On the cloud of is something valuable. The tech support needs improvement". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with CA Clarity PPM, JIRA Portfolio and JIRA, whereas Workfront is most compared with JIRA, Wrike and CA Clarity PPM.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use Workfront? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: February 2020. 399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter. The licensing was procured before my involvement. I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs. 399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 4,829 Comparisons 3,121 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 393 Avg. Rating 7.8 | Views 2,026 Comparisons 1,019 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. | Compared 25% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| MS Project Server | AtTask |
Learn | |
| Microsoft | Workfront |
Overview | |
| Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately. | AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server | Learn more about Workfront |
Sample Customers | |
| Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations | Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm38% Manufacturing Company25% Government25% Energy/Utilities Company13% Financial Services Firm17% Software R&D Company14% Manufacturing Company12% Media Company11% | Financial Services Firm36% Pharma/Biotech Company9% Manufacturing Company9% Logistics Company9% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: February 2020.
399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Microsoft Project Server Reviews, Workfront Reviews, and our list of Best Project Portfolio Management Companies.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.