Compare Microsoft Project Server vs. Workfront

Microsoft Project Server is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 5 reviews while Workfront is ranked 15th in Project Management Software. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Workfront is rated 0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "The division between the onsite work On the cloud of is something valuable. The tech support needs improvement". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with CA Clarity PPM, JIRA Portfolio and JIRA, whereas Workfront is most compared with JIRA, Wrike and CA Clarity PPM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Workfront Logo
2,026 views|1,019 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Workfront? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: February 2020.
399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.The licensing was procured before my involvement.I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,829
Comparisons
3,121
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
393
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
2,026
Comparisons
1,019
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
MS Project ServerAtTask
Learn
Microsoft
Workfront
Overview
Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
Learn more about Workfront
Sample Customers
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller FoundationsAdvance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Manufacturing Company25%
Government25%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Software R&D Company14%
Manufacturing Company12%
Media Company11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Logistics Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: February 2020.
399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.