Compare Microsoft Project Server vs. Workfront
Most Helpful Review | |
Use Workfront? Share your opinion. | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2021. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"It is on the expensive side." | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs. 456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 4,390 Comparisons 2,841 Reviews 4 Average Words per Review 447 Rating 8.0 | Views 1,797 Comparisons 882 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 23% of the time.  Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. | Compared 31% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. Compared 10% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| MS Project Server | AtTask |
Learn | |
| Microsoft | Workfront |
Overview | |
| Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately. | AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server | Learn more about Workfront |
Sample Customers | |
| Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations | Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm30% Manufacturing Company20% Government20% Energy/Utilities Company10% Computer Software Company22% Comms Service Provider15% Government10% Financial Services Firm7% | Financial Services Firm33% Manufacturing Company17% University8% Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm8% Computer Software Company29% Retailer10% Healthcare Company9% Comms Service Provider7% |
Company Size | |
Small Business29% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise54% | Small Business29% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise46% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 4th in Project Portfolio Management with 5 reviews while Workfront is ranked 15th in Project Management Software. Microsoft Project Server is rated 8.0, while Workfront is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Simple user experience with good usability and accessibility". On the other hand, Microsoft Project Server is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity PPM, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Planview Enterprise One and Planisware, whereas Workfront is most compared with Jira, ServiceNow IT Business Management, Asana, monday.com and Broadcom Clarity PPM.
See our list of .
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.