We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I especially like the reporting tools, which are visual tools and offer visual reports."
"Microsoft Project is easy to use and helps our teams visualize the evolution of our projects."
"Resource leveling is very useful. We like this feature. We like to be able to expand tasks and look at different resources and tasks usages. It is good at assigning tasks to teams. It is pretty compliant with the Project Management Institute approach, which is useful for being comprehensive. It allows us to make little Gantt charts and network diagrams."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scheduling, managing the resources, budgeting, tracking the progress, viewing the progress, reporting, and it is very easy to use."
"Microsoft Project is used to track the project delivery and the project management."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The reporting and national resource capacity planning are the most valuable features."
"The solution is stable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"This solution needs more customization."
"The scalability is co-dependent on the stability of the product. We have 4000 users, and at times the product is slow."
"We'd like the solution to have better integration with other third-party and open-source solutions."
"We'd like to be able to see different timelines as a part of one task."
"Microsoft Project should include more visualization, queries to filter out data, and more reporting structures."
"It would be better if Microsoft Project were included in the DevOps stack. That is, I'd like to see this tool integrated to a different stack of the applications that we normally use in DevOps, such as in Jira, for example, to deploy a different version related to the different tasks that are included in Microsoft Project."
"I would like to have more access to templates and tools that could be used to teach project management best practices."
"It's hard to reach technical people to get the help you need."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
Microsoft Project is ranked 2nd in Project Management Software with 77 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 19th in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Microsoft Project is rated 8.0, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project writes "A stable solution that very accurately runs projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". Microsoft Project is most compared with Asana, Jira, Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet and monday.com, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our Microsoft Project vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
