We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Fast prototyping."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The case management is great."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"Pega's technical support could be better."
"If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 19th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.