We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The most valuable feature of Microsoft System Center is its GUI (graphical user interface)."
"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."
"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment."
"The installation process is easy."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"It can generate KPIs and management reports with monthly presentations on activities and updating the environment (success and failure)."
"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."
"Could be more user friendly."
"Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement."
"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."
"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."
"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."
"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."
"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft System Center is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 17 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.