We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Oracle Beehive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."Managing meeting on Microsoft Teams is better than managing traditional face to face meetings."
"The initial setup was okay."
"The solution is perfect and works pretty well. It gets your streaming and helps to get your calls. I like it a lot."
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the ease of use. It is very good for a small virtual office for meetings and calendars which sync well together."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it can be included in most systems...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The Audio Call feature is its most valuable feature."
"The chat functionality is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."
"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."
"I would like to see more customization options in the product such as more integration with other tools."
"The interface must be improved to reflect the true face of Office 365."
"One of my colleagues was trying to use Microsoft Teams on their laptop, and it was slow in terms of booting up when initially starting it. For example, it was not running in the background. In general, it takes some time to load. Zoom tends to have a faster loading time."
"There are a lot of creative people out there who can put some more UI capabilities in Microsoft Teams."
"The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams."
"The solution should standardize the options across platforms. What I mean by that is, sometimes, on the mobile, there are not the same options and set up features and functions as are available on the web or on the desktop app. Everything should have the exact same functionality, otherwise, it's difficult if some people are on mobile and others are on desktop."
"This solution is not as popular for companies to use as other solutions making it a disadvantage."
"They should include AI features in the solution."
"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 144 reviews while Oracle Beehive is ranked 19th in Enterprise Social Software. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Oracle Beehive is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Beehive writes "Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Oracle Beehive is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.