We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The group chat is very good."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the calendar integration and the integration of chat and chat history into events."
"I like the solution's chat and meeting feature. We have different teams and the product helps us to communicate fastly. Within five minutes all the teams can be on the same page."
"The most valuable features are that it is an all-in-one platform, making it very easy for collaboration with your core employees."
"You can use Microsoft Teams to chat with people, share your documents, manage your calendar, manage your project, and assign tasks."
"The video conferencing is good."
"Setting up Teams was not difficult."
"The tool makes it easy for us to book meetings. It seamlessly integrates with the Office application which we are using for the last four years."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."
"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."
"We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform."
"SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file."
"What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"I would say that Microsoft Team invitations from the calendar within the solution could be improved."
"The security needs improvement, as well as the ability to back up private chats."
"The chat option in the Teams tab is not very helpful. We don't use it very often. There is also an expiration on the recordings. It would be useful to not have a time limit."
"Microsoft Teams withdrew the Wiki function, which was quite a good and useful feature."
"It would be good if the solution had some sort of AI built into it while taking the transcript so that at least the sentences made sense."
"SharePoint was more robust and customizable earlier."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
"There are some issues with stability."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"Integration needs to be more straightforward, particularly with Azure. SharePoint also needs a more comprehensive introductory course for users."
"Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
