We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The planner and the breakout rooms are good and helpful features in Microsoft Teams."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is easy to use."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are scheduling a meeting and integration with other Microsoft services like SharePoint and OneDrive."
"It's easy to share information and upload and download files on Microsoft Teams."
"Microsoft Teams is a scalable tool because it integrates with many other tools and different kinds of apps."
"The chat functionality is the solution's most valuable feature."
"Multiple channels and tools for recording."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The overall functions are good."
"The entire product is good."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"There needs to be a robust change management platform that offers training to keep the user community aware of upcoming updates and features."
"The application's user interface on Google has shortcomings that need to be improved."
"Microsoft Teams does not have any features that Zoom, Skype, or Webex don't already have."
"The user interface is slightly weak in Microsoft Teams and could be improved."
"The UI can be further improved upon. When I used to use Skype, Skype was a small window that opened on your desktop. With Teams, when you use it, it occupies your full screen just like if you were in Word or Excel. Skype worked more like an app, which I preferred. I liked being able to use it in a minimized screen. If Teams could emulate that a bit, it would be a better user experience."
"There are a lot of frequent updates, which is a shortcoming of the tool."
"Signing up for a new device for the solution is challenging."
"I would like to get more frequent updates, and the solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas Symphony is most compared with Slack, Drupal and SharePoint. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
