We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has allowed for collaboration during the COVID-19 situation (work from home)."
"Microsoft Teams is a friendly and easy-to-install solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling."
"Multiple channels and tools for recording."
"The recording function, the transcript function, the chat function, the live caption function, and the setting up of groups to share documents are useful features of Microsoft Teams."
"Microsoft Teams is a scalable tool because it integrates with many other tools and different kinds of apps."
"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications."
"The communication part has been excellent so far."
"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."
"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."
"The product was easy to use."
"Storage is the best thing about the solution."
"The software could be optimized for Mac systems because sometimes it is slow and consumes a lot of memory."
"We encountered occasional outages, which occurred a couple of times last year while using the product."
"The solution's recording could be improved because it is not as good as other products."
"It's a bit slow, especially if you are downloading photos."
"There are a lot of creative people out there who can put some more UI capabilities in Microsoft Teams."
"We face issues related to screen-sharing and stability. It is very difficult to get Microsoft's support to troubleshoot the issues. The product also needs to update its recording features."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."
"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."
"The implementation could be made easier."
"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Workplace by Facebook is most compared with Yammer and SharePoint. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Workplace by Facebook report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
