Compare Microsoft Windows Defender vs. Symantec End-user Endpoint Security

Microsoft Windows Defender is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 11 reviews while Symantec End-user Endpoint Security is ranked 1st in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 31 reviews. Microsoft Windows Defender is rated 8.0, while Symantec End-user Endpoint Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Defender writes "A security implementation that supplies proactive issue resolution with cloud analytics and APT". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec End-user Endpoint Security writes "Reliable solution that offers good performance and the latest protection". Microsoft Windows Defender is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Security, Carbon Black CB Defense, Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Symantec End-user Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Security. See our Microsoft Windows Defender vs. Symantec End-user Endpoint Security report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Defender vs. Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We have liked the fact that it comes with Microsoft Windows 10 and it is constantly updated with all new virus definitions. It is also updated with new security features on a regular basis.Automatic scanning and cleaning of viruses is the best and most valuable feature helping this tool to thrive. If any viruses are found, they are cleaned automatically.The most valuable feature is that we can use the solution right out of the box without too much configuration.The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and the updates are very simple.Defender is integrated into the operating system. It's integrated with everything. You don't have to spend time analyzing what you have to do to be sure that the integration is okay between the security tool and all the other apps. This, from my point of view, is the main advantage.I like the real-time protection features. Windows Defender will detect if there's a threat like a Trojan or something like that but Kaspersky lets it run normally.This is a very go, proactive solution to threat protection using advanced analysis.It's really stable. I've used a lot of stuff, a lot of products, like ESET and Kaspersky. None of them are comparable with this one. This one is much better.

More Microsoft Windows Defender Pros »

In terms of most valuable features, I would say the console which provides us an exciter to keep the laptops up-to-date, gives us alerts when devices are not up-to-date, and so on. I also like the reporting feature and the centralized panel.Some important features that are included are the built-in firewall and device control.Some of the features that were important were a built-in firewall and device control.It's good at detecting signature-based stuff and stopping that.This solution helps in that I can control quite a few computers from our central location, with ease.The valuable features are device control, SONOR, and anti-virus.The firewall, malware, and anti-virus protection have earned its keep in times past by catching the unexpected.The most amazing qualities of Symantec Endpoint Protection is that it provides a total solution to all virus problems.

More Symantec End-user Endpoint Security Pros »

Cons
There is no behavior analytics for devices and endpoints. There is no behavior-based protection.With increase of cyber threats and cybersecurity issues, I would recommend that the product be developed like an AI product with more features which can counter any threat in the coming eras.There's scanning going on that occasionally topples the memory, causing everything to freeze. This should be fixed.I would like to be able to set up any kind of protection I want in the firewall, any IP address or any number.The solution needs to improve its ransomware. It's not so good. It could also use some general performance optimization for the computers the solution operates on, to ensure it does not slow down the devices.The system can always be simplified and have a better integration check. More detailed reports would be good. When it does the integrated check, it just shows if the system is okay but I want to know what happened.Updates are not coming out of preview quickly enough and it is holding back on the development of the product.The end-user also cannot do some advanced actions on it. It's a little bit complicated for our end-user, so it needs to be simplified.

More Microsoft Windows Defender Cons »

We had issues that we were never able to understand why they were happening. For example, clients were not getting their updates and we were never able to figure out why. What we did in such cases was reboot the machine and reinstall the software, and then it worked. But we were never able to figure out exactly why it stopped the updates.They are lacking the visibility that you get in a heuristical, next-generation AI product.They lack the visibility you get in a heuristical, artificial, AI type of product, like a next-gen antivirus.It needs to die. In my opinion, Symantec was a really great security company, 10, 15 years ago. They went out, they bought all the great tools and then they never did anything with them. So they've just fallen behind and there's nothing that's going to work now to bring them back up the date that's going to regain user confidence.In the next release of this solution, I would like to see more to do with malware, encryption technology, and controlling mobile devices.I would like to see improvements in the anti-virus and the device control features.Managements' number one item on the "Wish List" would have to do with the real-time scan of external media inserted into any client.It is only available to use on computers with higher-end specs.

More Symantec End-user Endpoint Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows.

More Microsoft Windows Defender Pricing and Cost Advice »

We pay our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and everything is included in that price.The pricing is a little bit more expensive than other competitors, if you compare it to Kaspersky, for example, or McAfee.The problem is Symantec is more expensive than other vendors.We receive a discounted price for this solution because we are a non-profit organization.Compared to other products and brands here in Mexico, the price is okay, somewhere in the middle. Our solution is unique in that it can adapt to a variety of pricing and licensing constraints considering we have the corporate, government, and academic mandates. ThePricing and licensing for our country is very good. It's not that expensive and the endpoint security is very good. It's not as cheap as some others, but they are not as good.We pay on a yearly basis...Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license.

More Symantec End-user Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
47,504
Comparisons
43,440
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
498
Avg. Rating
8.2
Views
43,360
Comparisons
37,053
Reviews
28
Average Words per Review
413
Avg. Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Windows Defender, Microsoft System Center Endpoint ProtectionSymantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
Learn
Microsoft
Broadcom
Overview
Windows Defender Pro is your first line of defense against spyware and other unwanted software. And in Windows 7, it's easier to use, with simpler notifications, more scanning options, and less impact on your computer's performance.

Unmatched Endpoint Safety for Your OrganizationAs an on-premises, hybrid, or cloud-based solution, the single-agent Symantec platform protects all your traditional and mobile endpoint devices, and uses artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize security decisions.

Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Windows Defender
Learn more about Symantec End-user Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Auckland Transport, Erste Bank Group, Urban Software Institute, NJVC, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider14%
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider10%
Government7%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
University9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Healthcare Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government7%
Media Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise62%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Windows Defender vs. Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
426,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.