Compare Mobile Center vs. UFT (QTP)

Mobile Center is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Mobile Center is rated 6.8, while UFT (QTP) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Mobile Center writes "Enables users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Mobile Center is most compared with Appium, Perfecto Mobile and Experitest SeeTest, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our Mobile Center vs. UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mobile Center Logo
2,335 views|1,242 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,603 views|15,713 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Mobile Center? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Mobile Center vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization.The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare.It is a complete solution for mobile application testing.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see more integration with automation tools.We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it.The documentation and user interface both need improvement.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
22nd
Views
2,335
Comparisons
1,242
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
447
Avg. Rating
6.8
2nd
Views
25,603
Comparisons
15,713
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
967
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile CenterMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus Mobile Center software is the single gateway that enables you to redefine the mobile experience by delivering a predictable and repeatable mechanism for testing, monitoring, and improving any mobile app throughout its lifecycle using real-devices and emulators. The solution is designed to allow customers to deliver high-quality mobile applications and ensure a consistent, positive user experience under any circumstance. Micro Focus Mobile Center provides seamless integration with the testing components of Micro Focus' Application Delivery Management suite, and with Appium and Selenium. it is designed to support Continuous testing and Continuous integrations frameworks. This allowing customers to extend existing mobile investments without having to re-skill their teams or reengineer the backend. The solution covers all aspects of the mobile app lifecycle including manual, functional, performance, and security testing under real-world network conditions, include proactive monitoring, Mobile analytics and user sentiment analysis. Any device can now be managed and used throughout the app lifecycle to assess user experience before any issues impact the user.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Mobile Center
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
John Lewis, NBrIX, HPE Technology Services, Neosecure, FEMSA CSC, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise85%
Find out what your peers are saying about Mobile Center vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email