Compare Moogsoft vs. StackState

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Auvik Logo
Read 12 Auvik reviews.
827 views|199 comparisons
Moogsoft Logo
7,959 views|5,327 comparisons
StackState Logo
868 views|501 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to other products, Auvik's pricing is more feasible since you get all its features. You pay for licenses on a per network device basis. It monitors hypervisors, but does not bill for that. There are no additional costs, which is something that I like.""The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per device, because as you hit different pricing tiers, it becomes much more affordable per device.""Its pricing is a little on the high end. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. It is more expensive than other solutions, but their per-device model is very fair. Anything other than the networking gear is monitored by Auvik at no charge.""The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price.""It's great for small businesses, but when you start reviewing the pricing model, depending on how many devices, and what sub-devices you decide to pull in, it can get tricky as far as the pricing goes.""As an individual IP company, Auvik is a little bit pricey. It is a little expensive, but as an MSP owner, I have a small side business. So, I'm an Auvik customer in that sense too. In that, I think it's reasonable to pay $10 to $15 a device or less depending on the endpoint. For the amount of capability that it has, it is very reasonably priced.""Its pricing is very reasonable. We had looked at other solutions where you pay based on the amount of traffic that was filtered through and analyzed. With Auvik, we pay by a billable device. We're not paying based on every single device we have. For one of the locations I have, one network element would likely be a billable device. So, every billable device has a network element, but not every network element is a billable device. If I have a location that has 50 network elements, then maybe 30 of them are billable devices. PCs, VoIP phones, and access points are monitored at no charge.""The cost for all the devices that we were billed at in my last job was about $2500 annually. It wasn't much. It has the most reasonable pricing as compared to any product out there. I can't complain. It is amazing. It allows me to bundle inside the package what I charge customers per user per month. I don't charge them per device anymore. That's not how we do things in the industry. It is per user per month. The way Auvik is charging us allows me to do it. For example, if they charge $250 for a certain number of seats, I'm just going to write the costs onto per user per month. I have a few leftover licenses to use, which allows me to go out and make some more sales and give some freebies at some shows. So, it makes me very flexible. I am very happy with it. It is billed by network devices. You could choose which billable device you want. What is really nice is that if you don't want one switch to be billable and the other one to be billable, you can do that. You just won't have the features that the billable switch has, which isn't horrible. Sometimes, you don't need that. What I'm really happy about is that Auvik doesn't force things on you and doesn't say, "You have to have all of this," and that's a great business model."

More Auvik Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: One of the best things about Auvik, and it's why it's one of my go-to products, are the remote access capabilities… more »
Top Answer: The pricing is fair for the value and time saved that you get out of it. The larger you go, the more sense it makes per… more »
Top Answer: The logging features could be a little bit better polished, although that aspect is relatively new. It comes in as raw… more »
Top Answer: I like the prediction features.
Top Answer: With the multi-cloud and hybrid clouds coming into place, and where managed services are coming into existence. I would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Auvik is cloud-based software that simplifies and automates network monitoring and management to give you complete network visibility and control.

Designed to deploy in minutes, you’ll resolve problems faster than ever with real-time network mapping and inventory, powerful troubleshooting features, deep network traffic insights, automated config backups and restore, and more. https://www.auvik.com/get-free-trial

Moogsoft AIOps sits on top of your entire production stack (including ITOM and APM) and extends across your automation, service management, log indexing and notification tools. Algorithmic Noise Reduction automatically reduces event volumes to unique alerts without relying on rules, filters or models. This enables your team to analyze all of your monitoring ecosystem events with no noise and no blind spots.

The StackState AIOps platform is a unique offering as we combine:

- Topology – view all components and all their dependencies, on prem and cloud;
- Telemetry – see all metrics, events and logs per component, regardless of its source;
- Tracing – insights into end-to-end customer journey at code level;
- Time travelling – travel back to any moment in time.

We make this possible through our unique version graph database (the so called 4T model).

Again, all combined in one model, one view. Future ready as new technologies will be launched and will be included into StackState’s AIOps platform.

On top of this platform we offer state of the art AI capabilities for:
- Root Cause Analysis;
- Impact Analysis;
- Predictive Analytics;
- Anomaly detection;
- Remediation and Automation

This helps our customer to drastically reduce Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). All together this makes StackState the only vendor today which makes AIOps a reality.

Offer
Learn more about Auvik
Learn more about Moogsoft
Learn more about StackState
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
RetailNext
IBM, T-Systems, Fujitsu, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company22%
Computer Software Company22%
Security Firm11%
Renewables & Environment Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Construction Company12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise23%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business61%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise21%
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: July 2021.
523,975 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Moogsoft is ranked 15th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while StackState is ranked 52nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Moogsoft is rated 7.4, while StackState is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Moogsoft writes "Improves the efficiency of our organization but it should have more artificial intelligence ". On the other hand, Moogsoft is most compared with Splunk, BigPanda, Datadog, Nagios XI and Loom Systems, whereas StackState is most compared with Datadog, Splunk Insights for Infrastructure, Scout APM, Zabbix and BigPanda.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.