We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"API management."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"It should give better control over account management."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 39 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Zapier, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
