We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Mule Expression Language"
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvement in the generator for the DataWeave language so that it's a little more graphic."
"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"The stability could be improved."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
