We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"The interface is fine and the solution is quite robust."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"Community editions need more attention."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"It would be great to see implementing security modules as a feature."
"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"The interface console is very slow. Even in production, we need to increase the RAM or CPU. And even after that, the performance is still not good in production."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."
Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.
Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.
Mule ESB is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 9 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 9 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 7.6, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Well performing and easy to use solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "A pretty good solution with helpful plugins and reasonable pricing". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Red Hat Fuse, webMethods Integration Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator. See our Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.