Mule ESB vs. SEEBURGER BIS

Mule ESB is ranked 1st in ESB with 11 reviews vs SEEBURGER BIS which is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 11 reviews. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Some of the valuable features are parallel processing support and integration with other products". The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Very powerful mapping tool that handles all our EDI requirements". Mule ESB is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and Oracle Service Bus. SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB and webMethods Trading Networks.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Software AG, Oracle and others in ESB.
300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Mule ESB vs. SEEBURGER BIS

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company.Scalability and load balancing.We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow.Mule Expression Language

Read more »

Because of the visibility of the front-end, I can respond to problems faster. We know about issues more quickly. Our reaction time has improved at least 50 percent.We have increased the volume of transaction processing for our organization by bringing in over a billion dollars of revenue a year. Without this system, we wouldn't be able to do this and keep up with that volume.The front-end interface is important, as it gives us visibility into the system and has easy remediation steps to solving problems. We can also address problems quickly.The platform has been very consistent and responsive.The stability is world-class. It is as good as any of the other options out there. They have addressed hiccups quickly, professionally, and with an excellent response.It used to take half an hour to move one file from one location to another. Now, it takes 10 minutes.The solution is flexible when it comes to adding integrations. It is much easier to use than the other tools we have to move the files. Across the board, we can move files in a short amount of time compared to our other existing tools.The system is user-friendly and easy to maintain, and it has the features that we need.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
The payment system needs improvement.Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus.It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed.Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome.

Read more »

The product has the ability to do a lot of things. However, it doesn't come out of the box that way. Therefore, if you want to do something special, it has to be a customization and that could be costly. What can the product do: Pretty much anything under the sun. However, getting the product to do it, won't be easy.In the front-end, we have what are called agreements. In each agreement, we can use what is called a map. The drop down list to select the map appears to be old technology and shouldn't be used anymore. It should be an elegant solution for identifying or finding a map to an agreement. We have thousands of maps, and if I want to find a map, I have to scroll through thousands of them to get to the one I want. It should be much more enhanced.Their traditional model is a vendor flow. We are looking to do a customer-based flow, which which require significant development from SEEBURGER. We are working with them to do this using their WebEDI. It is a brand new area for them, but it could be an option in the future.The initial setup is not the straightforward. It took couple of months for us to set up.The general support center should have a dedicated person who is familiar with a client's system instead of a general support tech who doesn't really know the client's system.Difficult in handling large amounts of data, like when the file has more than 100MB in size.I would like there to be a feature that could handle the limited server.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners.This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor.

Read more »

It's highly scalable, but at a cost. Financially, it costs a lot of money to scale it. If you're having to deploy many implementations of the product, then you get into licensing costs. From a technology perspective, it's highly scalable.The pricing is outrageously, super expensive. Everybody has to earn a living, but it is exorbitant. This is a challenge for us because we have to justify the cost.It costs you half a million dollars to install it, and that's a lot of money.I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction.The pricing and licensing is very competitive.The pricing is not expensive and the licensing is fine. We pay for licenses and support yearly.The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
36,052
Comparisons
21,021
Reviews
11
Followers
663
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
2,340
Comparisons
1,111
Reviews
8
Followers
191
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 15% of the time.
See more Mule ESB competitors »
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SEEBURGER BIS competitors »
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Website/Video
MuleSoft
Seeburger
Null Vendor
Overview
For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Mule ESB
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, CamelotAltis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company
43%
Manufacturing Company
29%
Pharma/Biotech Company
14%
Construction Company
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Transportation Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Logistics Company
16%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
47%
Midsize Enterprise
12%
Large Enterprise
41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
8%
Large Enterprise
72%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
91%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Software AG, Oracle and others in ESB.
Download now
300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email