Mule ESB vs. SEEBURGER BIS

Mule ESB is ranked 1st in ESB with 12 reviews vs SEEBURGER BIS which is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 18 reviews. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Some of the valuable features are parallel processing support and integration with other products". The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation among numerous standard files as well as structure EDI files". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server and Oracle Service Bus. SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mule ESB Logo
37,827 views|20,250 comparisons
SEEBURGER BIS Logo
2,715 views|1,158 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Software AG, IBM and others in ESB.
310,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company.Scalability and load balancing.We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow.Mule Expression Language

Read more »

Among the most valuable features are the EDI translator and a lot of the components which enable creating compliance sets. Having something standard out-of-the-box and being able to use that has been a huge benefit for us.Another aspect that we employed in the last year-and-a-half has been their CMA platform component, which hooks to the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) front end. We've been able to set up an automatic testing process for our partners.One valuable feature is the scalability. We have not had to add processing power or hardware since we installed it. Also, we are able to create and deploy maps to migrate from another EDI platform very quickly.It has a lot of basic EDI already established for all the main users. Also, it lets me share setups that I had already set up for my first plant. I was able to use them for my second one which was very helpful. I didn't have to start from scratch for my second facility.The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities.SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) also allowed us to connect EDI vendors at will.For the tool that we used to have, we had specially trained developers who used to do all the development of EDI maps and the configuration. But with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) now, we were able to train our EDI analysts, and because the tool has very simple, intuitive mapping capabilities, even our EDI analysts are able to develop all the EDI maps, do all the configurations, and do all the setups for any of the trading partners.One of the things that SEEBURGER always touts is their ability to do "any to any" formatting... it doesn't matter if you want to take a CSV file or an XML file or a flat file or a PDF file or a structure EDI file; you can transform it from one format to another - any to any or even to the same format - which is a really nice feature.

Read more »

Cons
The payment system needs improvement.Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus.It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed.Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome.

Read more »

They made improvements to the email error alerts that go out, for the EDI technical. Those typically go straight out to the partners. Those messages are significantly clearer and easy to read. The same messages in the front end are not nearly as clear. It's supposed to be the same error, but the message that goes out for EDI is really easy for anybody to read and understand, but you have to be really solution-savvy to understand the message in the system itself.Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario.A true debugger that allows you to step through the process would be a good improvement. Right now, we are limited to reading the log file generated by the test screen in Mapping Designer.I would've liked, from day one, to learn how to do my own mapping. That would have saved a lot of time and effort if that had been brought forward earlier. It's there, I just didn't know about it. Also, some tidier, easier-to-use interfaces would help.When we got SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), it was clear that it was going to take more of a technical person. It does take a technically-rooted individual to operate it. It's not something for your everyday guy to do. For what it's doing for us, a dedicated resource is required.In some of the other tools out there in the market, you can create one service and use that service without creating a copy. That kind of capability currently doesn't exist in this solution.The BIS Front End needs a little bit of refreshing, especially when it comes to setting up new trading partners and trading partner agreements or transactions. It can be a bit clumsy to copy and rename and then go in and modify.On the server side, there are a lot of administration and configuration files that you need to go in and do maintenance on. You have to find them in a certain folder so it's very error-prone and it can be a little time consuming unless it's documented. They could pull some of those individual configuration files into the product itself where there's a better user interface for that.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Plan your licensing model (cloud or on-premises or hybrid) that will allow seamless integration with new partners.This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor.

Read more »

Pricing has always seemed fair.I find the pricing expensive. But I know that when we evaluated another company, it was about the same. That just seems to be the market. It's probably not expensive overall.The pricing is cheap. In fact, when I saw the pricing, I thought, "Really? What's the catch?" But the functionality that we get out of it, for the price we pay, is great value.Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper.The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially.All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want...Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run.It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
310,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 24 in ESB
Views
37,827
Comparisons
20,250
Reviews
12
Followers
669
Avg. Rating
8.2
Views
2,715
Comparisons
1,158
Reviews
16
Followers
193
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
MuleSoft
Seeburger
Overview
For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Offer
Learn more about Mule ESB
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Sample Customers
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, CamelotAltis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm28%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider9%
Healthcare Company9%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company33%
Manufacturing Company17%
Retailer17%
Pharma/Biotech Company17%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Software AG, IBM and others in ESB.
310,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email