We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The documentation is great; it is always up to date and well-presented."
"When using the Mulesoft Anypoint Platform, it has a wide range of connectors that are readily available to connect with the multiple applications."
"The most effective features of Anypoint API Manager for policy enforcement include security enforcement, rate limiting, client enforcement, traffic control, service level agreement policies, and caching policies."
"The entire offering and suite of tools that this solution provides have been very valuable. We are able to manage APIs on runtime on a cloud basis which has been very useful."
"Technical support has been helpful."
"The tool has a private area. It also has a cloud deployment option."
"Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors."
"The product improved data exchange processes by enhancing communication between various messaging queues. There was a heavy reliance on queues for indexing clusters and data transfer in this particular environment. The product facilitated the transfer of messages from one queue to another, ensuring data flow and processing across different topics."
"The performance is good."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"I would like to see more automation. Operations are done manually. It should also automate in the operation."
"Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful."
"MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower."
"I'd like more monitoring and analyzing features included in the future."
"Migrating any existing middleware platform to Mulesoft is difficult because of the transformation, conversion and integration involved. Better tools are needed to achieve quicker time to market."
"It is not a very scalable solution."
"Not many stand-out features."
"The solution is missing a monetization module."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.