We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Skyhigh Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"It gives a very good overview of the inventory assessment process, and it can be accessed across our company because it's a global tool."
"It's a good product. After the scan our internet works well. It scans our security posture."
"The reporting is fine."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"The risk rating of each cloud application has been very useful. Whenever we discover a new application is use, we are able to quickly determine if this application is safe to use and whether or not we should allow our end users to be able to access it."
"Without Skyhigh, we had zero visibility, but now we are aware of so much more."
"The solution performs well."
"The feature I like best about Skyhigh Security is its wide range of product support. For example, my company had NetApp storage running, and Skyhigh Security has on-premises NetApp storage support, which isn't available in other solutions. Skyhigh Security also has a better filtering feature versus the filtering feature in other solutions."
"The support is excellent."
"I like the encrypted disk feature and the endpoint protection."
"The most valuable features of McAfee Web Gateway are anti-malware, reports, and powerful categorization of web pages."
"It help us monitor high risk services, blocking them, and also feeding them to our egress points."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"Improve the API speed."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
"SkyHigh has the ability to place users or groups on a ‘Watchlist’; which allows you to see certain views with these Watchlists users/groups in them. This is great when you are looking at live data but if I wanted to generate a report on "only" the watchlists."
"The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities."
"The virtual solution requires improvement."
"MVISION Cloud is not well known and there should be more information about the solution. There could be integration to local applications."
"McAfee Web Gateway could improve the reporting. We have the reporting on a separate server and sometimes the database becomes full. These aspects could improve."
"User interface could be more intuitive."
"The cloud needs improvement with respect to DLP."
"McAfee needs to add more products that could be managed from the cloud."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews while Skyhigh Security is ranked 7th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 51 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
