MySQL vs Noms

MySQL is ranked 1st in Open Source Databases with 35 reviews vs Noms which is ranked 9th in Open Source Databases. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Offers a simple DBMS solution with a very low hardware footprint. Only one of the engines supports ACID transaction control". MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, CockroachDB and Oracle Database. Noms is most compared with SQLite, Firebird SQL and MySQL.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
20858
Based on 35 reviews.
30837
Most Helpful Review

Have A Question About Open Source Databases?

Our experts can help. 288,343 professionals have used our research on 6,486 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing MySQL vs Noms

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up.MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around.​Enterprise editions and support are definitely needed for the heavy users who need direct support. ​When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
14,103
Comparisons
7,819
Reviews
34
Followers
1,661
Avg. Rating
8.1
Views
145
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Followers
44
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
See more MySQL competitors »
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
See more Noms competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoOracle
Attic Labs
Overview
Overview

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

Noms is a decentralized database philosophically descendant from the Git version control system.

Like Git, Noms is:

Versioned: By default, all previous versions of the database are retained. You can trivially track how the database evolved to its current state, easily and efficiently compare any two versions, or even rewind and branch from any previous version.

Synchronizable: Instances of a single Noms database can be disconnected from each other for any amount of time, then later reconcile their changes efficiently and correctly.

Unlike Git, Noms is a database, so it also:

Primarily stores structured data, not files and directories (see: the Noms type system)

Scales well to large amounts of data and concurrent clients (TODO: benchmarks)

Supports atomic transactions (a single instance of Noms is CP, but Noms is typically run in production backed by S3, in which case it is "effectively CA")

Supports efficient indexes (see: Noms prolly-trees)

Features a flexible query model (see: GraphQL)

Finally, because Noms is content-addressed, it yields a very pleasant programming model.

Working with Noms is declarative. You don't INSERT new data, UPDATE existing data, or DELETE old data. You simply declare what the data ought to be right now. If you commit the same data twice, it will be deduplicated because of content-addressing. If you commit almost the same data, only the part that is different will be written.

OFFER
Learn more about MySQL
Learn more about Noms
Sample Customers
Sample Customers Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University
22%
Mining And Metals Company
11%
Integrator
6%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government
9%
Media Company
9%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
43%
Midsize Enterprise
27%
Large Enterprise
31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
29%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
47%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs PostgreSQL and others in Open Source Databases.
Download now
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email