Compare MySQL vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 13 reviews while SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 12th in Relational Databases. MySQL is rated 8.0, while SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 0. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Offers a simple DBMS solution with a very low hardware footprint. Only one of the engines supports ACID transaction control". On the other hand, MySQL is most compared with CockroachDB, IBM Db2 and Firebird SQL, whereas SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SAP IQ, SAP HANA and Oracle Database.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MySQL Logo
Read 13 MySQL reviews.
13,878 views|11,832 comparisons
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Logo
3,036 views|2,327 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: October 2019.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up.MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around.​Enterprise editions and support are definitely needed for the heavy users who need direct support. ​When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
13,878
Comparisons
11,832
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
421
Avg. Rating
8.0
12th
Views
3,036
Comparisons
2,327
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
254
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
SAP ASE
Learn
Oracle
SAP
Overview

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

With SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (SAP ASE), you can handle massive volumes of data and thousands of concurrent users to accelerate the growth of new data-driven business applications. Drive value with a faster, more efficient transactional system that is designed to meet the demands of the digital economy.

Offer
Learn more about MySQL
Learn more about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise
Sample Customers
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University23%
Software R&D Company9%
Non Tech Company9%
Mining And Metals Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company21%
Retailer14%
Comms Service Provider10%
University9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: October 2019.
379,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email