Compare MySQL vs. SAP IQ

MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 13 reviews while SAP IQ is ranked 10th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews. MySQL is rated 8.0, while SAP IQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Offers a simple DBMS solution with a very low hardware footprint. Only one of the engines supports ACID transaction control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "An excellent column-based, enterprise relational database solution with good speed and compression". MySQL is most compared with CockroachDB, IBM Db2 and Firebird SQL, whereas SAP IQ is most compared with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, Apache Hadoop and SAP HANA. See our MySQL vs. SAP IQ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MySQL Logo
Read 13 MySQL reviews.
13,878 views|11,832 comparisons
SAP IQ Logo
3,997 views|2,870 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It creates a unified view of the entire architecture and performance factor, helping to manage the network more easily.It has a remote access feature to manage the database from a remote location. This enables in-work collaboration.I use MySQL for employee service in an OLTP database.Support for enterprise-grade features like clustering, master-slave replication, even Sharding (to some extent) which is an advanced feature.​The most valuable feature of MySQL is the informative error outputs of command line interface.​​We use MySQL for enterprise data storage as well as part of the back-end of websites and web applications.​Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run.​A lot of the software components have been trialed and tested for often more than 10 years.

Read more »

Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database.

Read more »

Cons
The only service which could be improved is its usability. The entire user experience needs to be revamped to meet the 2018 design standards.When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version.I feel that some tools which make it easier to create queries or make it easier for other functions would be really interesting to see.Some problems with big table operations, and a struggle to keep the servers responding in peak situations.It would be helpful if there were a graphical user interface to administer, configure, and tune it.If it had something similar to Microsoft’s DTS engine then it would be the best database system out there.​MySQL needs improvements on its diagnostic features.​​MySQL is not easily scalable on cost effective consumer grade hardware.​

Read more »

The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up.MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around.​Enterprise editions and support are definitely needed for the heavy users who need direct support. ​When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support.

Read more »

The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
13,878
Comparisons
11,832
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
421
Avg. Rating
8.0
10th
Views
3,997
Comparisons
2,870
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
732
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Sybase IQ
Learn
Oracle
SAP
Overview

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

Offer
Learn more about MySQL
Learn more about SAP IQ
Sample Customers
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University23%
Non Tech Company9%
Mining And Metals Company9%
Software R&D Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Retailer15%
Comms Service Provider10%
University9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm67%
Marketing Services Firm11%
Insurance Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email