We performed a comparison between Nagios Fusion and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Nagios Fusion version 12.8 excels in user-friendly GUI design, cost-effectiveness, and ease of deployment."
"It's very easy to manage and monitor it."
"It is easier for client installation, and the configurations are doable even for a newcomer in the field."
"Being open source lets us customize it for our monitoring needs, saving us money."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"Zabbix helps to save time."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The initial setup was not complex."
"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."
"It has an intuitive UI with beautiful graphs and customizable maps."
"In future iterations of this solution, there is a desire for more seamless integration with other monitoring software."
"Nagios Fusion should include a 'remember me' option when logging in, so we don't need to enter a username and password every time."
"There are some bugs, although not that many. There are some situations where the solution is not stable but the number of problems is not very high."
"Adding application performance monitoring to the product alongside infrastructure monitoring would make it a more complete and useful solution."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."
"The stability could be better."
"The server monitoring could be better."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
"Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement."
"Look and feel."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
Nagios Fusion is ranked 48th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 4 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 98 reviews. Nagios Fusion is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nagios Fusion writes "Helps to make sure everything runs smoothly and reliably". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Nagios Fusion is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our Nagios Fusion vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
