We performed a comparison between NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that I have found most valuable are that it is a cheaper price and user-friendly."
"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of creating a backup copy job to get the backups to a second device."
"The chat functionality with Nakivo Support in the web interface is very unique and we love it."
"It was also very easy to configure backups to be sent offsite to a separate repository for disaster recovery needs."
"Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly."
"It is affordable."
"The user interface in general is very good. I"
"The solution is stable."
"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."
"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful."
"An improvement would be to include a general data backup solution that is not only for virtual machines."
"The product needs to improve backup speed and replication speed."
"What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests."
"While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."
"Sometimes, for some VMs and some Windows Server versions, specifically old versions (aka server 12 or older) fail due to the VSS writer error or locking file system."
"We would like to back up File Shares to Amazon S3/Wasabi."
"The way encryption is currently working could be improved. Currently, it's not possible to encrypt the backup to an NFS share directly. It needs to have the encryption within the Transporter/VM to enable encryption, which isn't optimal. So I'm hoping that in the near future this function will be implemented."
"I would love to see compatibility with KVM Backup."
"The pricing could be better."
"They need better reporting on the environment."
"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."
More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 84 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 3 reviews. NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Performs well, easy to manage, resilient, and the technical support is helpful". NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.