We performed a comparison between NAKIVO Backup & Replication and StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."This solution was surprisingly easy to configure."
"The updates are problem-free, so we can keep Nakivo up to date on the server and NAS too."
"Nakivo makes our backs-ups more reliable and easy to recover in case of full damage or partial retrieval of files - all at a convenient cost."
"The automatic backup and replication features are invaluable, saving us time and resources by automating routine backup tasks and ensuring data protection without manual intervention."
"Technical support responds very quickly."
"Nakivo offers direct support through the graphical interface and this is great to have if you need quick help."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is a cheaper price and user-friendly."
"Backups are working smoothly with Nakivo Backup."
"The most valuable feature is the backups."
"I like that they have some new devices that are simpler to use because they kind of tie right into the cloud."
"While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."
"I would love to see compatibility with KVM Backup."
"It is missing the file and folder backup; however, this product is meant for virtual machine backup and recovery, so that is really outside of the scope of the software."
"It'll help if they offered some automation and more usability for partners."
"Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available."
"I need no more valuable features for backs-up. I have not yet tried the latest release, however, I have all the features that I need."
"From our experience, the main factor that could be improved is adding more cloud services that are supported as a backup repository."
"So far, there is no version that supports Polish. If such a version existed, many customers in our region would decide to purchase and implement this solution."
"Their restoration protocols could be better. I pulled all my clients out of their cloud mostly because I wasn't confident that they could restore out of the cloud. This was backed up by friends who had been burned by stuff like that. We moved away because of the lack of resources to restore from a potential catastrophic failure. It's challenging, and in some cases, they couldn't do it because they didn't have enough resources. For example, if there was a major disaster, and everybody needed their images out of the cloud, they couldn't give them to everybody."
"StorageCraft ShadowXafe should improve the on-premises console management controls and protection and recovery."
More StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 84 reviews while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery. NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4, while StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] writes "An expensive next-generation data recovery and backup software solution with poor data restoration". NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto, whereas StorageCraft ShadowXafe [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
