Nastel AutoPilot vs Savision Live Maps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nastel Technologies Logo
173 views|122 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Martello Logo
184 views|152 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nastel AutoPilot and Savision Live Maps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
173
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
184
Comparisons
152
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Live Maps
Learn More
Overview
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre
Sample Customers
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company16%
Real Estate/Law Firm13%
Manufacturing Company11%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise65%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 79th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Savision Live Maps is ranked 70th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6, while Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with , whereas Savision Live Maps is most compared with SCOM, Accedian Skylight and Omnipliance.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.