Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
341,056 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The learning curve was really fast, which was also the reason for saving a lot on the budget.
The user interface is absolutely great. It creates an easy working environment because it has well-integrated hardware and software. So, it is easy to use.
It makes programming simpler.
The user interface is very good. Their boards are reliable. We buy boards from them, they are reliable, and we don't have problems with them.
Because their view is a graphical user interface (GUI), it's very easy to program the tool.
I can automate a lot of testing very quickly. With just a push of a button, I can test hundreds of different scenarios without having to do all that manual testing myself.
It saves me a lot of time. You can click a button and walk away, basically doing a week's worth of work in 20 minutes, it's a pretty good time saver.
It took us less than a week to get integrated into the solution, which is very fast.
B-scan is its most valuable feature.
We have multiple systems for manufacturing tests, and it's critical for our support. The support increases our productivity.
It is easy to handle, so everyone likes to use it.
Time domain measurement is very accurate compared to other devices.
This solution provides high confidence in the data being presented in the measurement to inform a design decision going forward.
The user interface is good, not very complicated. It is very intuitive.
The most valuable features are its ease of use, user interface, and PAM-4. The user interface is good and easy to use.
The sensitivity of the trigger and the reliability are the most valuable features.
I would like to have more RF. They're going that way, but still there is some work that they have to do.
The software has room for improvement.
I would like more speed and a reduction in size.
There is a learning curve. It takes one to two months to get acclimated to the tool.
It took a good year until I felt proficient using the product, as It is a complex program. Their newest version has a less steep learning curve, but back closer to 15 years ago, it was a lot less user-friendly.
National Instruments needs to be focusing on its 5G RF applications. They are aware of this, and that's where most of their R&D is going.
I would like to see more of a tasking user base and documentation inside the instrument itself, rather than having to go online for it.
I would like to see them increase the productivity and auxiliary functions.
We are looking for an Intel platform with the newest chipset.
I use microservices, but you cannot really probe it, since the technology is not really there.
If you are dealing with time domain measurement, I strongly recommend using a vendor other than this company.
There are other devices out there which are more capable, offering more features, with as good quality tech support.
I want the system to have a wider bandwidth because high-speed continues to move faster, so there is more bandwidth to cover.
On the source side, their AWGs don't have enough bandwidth. They need to increase the bandwidth of their AWGs, meaning they have to have a faster sample rate.
It needs one button and every time you push it, you get whatever you need.
I wish we could turn off the automatic measurement feature of the oscilloscope, for teaching purposes.
Pricing and Cost Advice
I have saved almost 50 percent of my total budget for a project by using their products.
They have an initial investment cost, which is quite high. But, along the way, there is so much behind it that the product is really invaluable.
It's a bit expensive. However, you get the entire package, not just the box. It's a box which supports older releases.
The cost of the equipment has room for improvement. The pricing could improve.
I would like more competitive pricing.
It's reasonably priced for what we spend our money on in the lab. It's one of the lower-end purchases.
These products are a very low-cost, effective alternative to traditional Big Iron ATE hardware.
The price is a little steep. A lot of people, like our customers, use a different machine because of the price. The price has to come down a bit so we can do other tests without paying the equipment's high costs.
The pricing is okay. It was within our budget.
It costs a quarter of a million. This technology is not cheap.
We demoed the product before purchasing it.
Tecktronix pricing tends to be pretty fair and reasonable with current market trends. They don't usually bump up the price too much.
The cost has room for improvement. Though compared to other companies, it's okay.
In the 100 gigabit Ethernet and 400 gigabit Ethernet category, everything is in the multi-hundred thousand dollar range, so it was fair pricing because everything is expensive.
They have academic pricing which is helpful.
Pricing could be lower. I would want to buy it for an extremely, low price, but Tektronix is a high-end product.
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Average Words per Review
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Average Words per Review
Compared 100% of the time.
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
|NI Oscilloscopes||TBS Series, TDS Series, MDO Series, MSO Series|
Turning powerful possibilities into real solutions with our open, software-defined platform for automated test and automated measurement systems.
8 out of 10 engineers around the world trust Tektronix to help them debug and test tomorrow's designs faster. With the broadest portfolio of digital oscilloscopes available, the richest set of product features, the most extensive analysis capability and our award-winning service and support, Tektronix has the right oscilloscope to meet your needs.
Learn more about National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes
Learn more about Tektronix Oscilloscopes