Compare NEC Sigmablade-M vs. Oracle Netra Modular System

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
16th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
83
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
41
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Sigmablade-M
Learn
NEC
Oracle
Overview

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Offer
Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-M
Learn more about Oracle Netra Modular System
Sample Customers
Sysmex ShanghaiOvum
NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 16th in Blade Servers while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with , whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.