We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's great for those that don't have as much exposure to programming."
"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."
"For anyone who does not have experience with automation, ReadyAPI provides a sense of comfort, especially for testers who find it hard to go directly into coding."
"The most valuable feature is being able to run each version for test suites."
"When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API."
"It's easy to implement."
"Reporting is more robust than other products because test reports can be exported in multiple ways."
"It is the best solution you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing."
"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"My company has a good experience with Tricentis NeoLoad, and what I like best about it is that it lets you generate loads from different geographies. The load generation agents getting placed on different geographies is a very good feature of the solution. I also like that you can scale up Tricentis NeoLoad very quickly. The general feedback on performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad for all product lines within my company is good."
"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."
"In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool."
"Version control does not work well."
"The reporting in ReadyAPI could be better. It can become sloppy, sometimes it works and other times it does not."
"Areas for improvement include the security files, endpoints, and process sessions."
"Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."
"To generate a test suite in API, I had to create a separate one each time because otherwise it was just override the test. Each API had to be added separately. I thought I could just have one and then create different methods, but I had to add each API separately to create the test for that. That is an area that could be improved."
"The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved."
"Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions."
"ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
"The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times."
"We would like to see the addition of one-to-one integrations with the Tricentis Tosca suite to this product, which would then cover the end-to-end needs of our customers who are looking for a single vendor solution."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"The SAP area could be improved."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
ReadyAPI is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 33 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 57 reviews. ReadyAPI is rated 7.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText LoadRunner Professional, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and IBM Rational Performance Tester. See our ReadyAPI vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.