We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"The Frameworks feature is valuable. NeoLoad Web and the API are also valuable. It provides API support."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors. The tool has a better design, scenarios, and model, which I find helpful. I also found the Result Manager a fascinating part of Tricentis NeoLoad because of the way it collates results and presents reports. The straightforward implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad, including ease of use, is also valuable to my team."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"We would like to see the addition of one-to-one integrations with the Tricentis Tosca suite to this product, which would then cover the end-to-end needs of our customers who are looking for a single vendor solution."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."
"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 57 reviews. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and OpenText LoadRunner Professional, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.