Compare Neotys NeoLoad vs. Tricentis Flood

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Neotys NeoLoad Logo
7,144 views|3,897 comparisons
Tricentis Flood Logo
900 views|654 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Neotys NeoLoad vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""Their technical support is awesome."

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

Cons
"NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool."

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."

More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Ranking
3rd
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
7,144
Comparisons
3,897
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
314
Rating
8.3
12th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
900
Comparisons
654
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
559
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
NeoLoad
Flood IO
Learn More
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Sample Customers
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Individual & Family Service13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider17%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Neotys NeoLoad vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 12th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4, while Tricentis Flood is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Silk Performer, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Apache JMeter. See our Neotys NeoLoad vs. Tricentis Flood report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.