NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs Oracle Cloud Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently.""Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better.""High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Pros →

"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface.""It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side.""I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Cons →

"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."

More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."
  • More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a yearly subscription for the product."
  • More Oracle Cloud Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security.
    Top Answer:We have a yearly subscription for the product.
    Top Answer:Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,200
    Comparisons
    711
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,768
    Comparisons
    1,667
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    259
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
    Learn More
    Overview

    NetApp® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies.

    Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud. Other use cases include hybrid deployments, multicloud mobility, big data analytics, web serving and content management, application development and testing, media and entertainment workflows, database backups, container storage, and more.

    Features. Multiple performance tiers, standard file interfaces, advanced data management, metered service, fully managed service, native service experience, integrated support, and integrated billing.

    For more information:

    NetApp: https://cloud.netapp.com/cloud-volumes-service-for-gcp

    Google: https://cloud.google.com/netapp

    Scale with no new hardware - eliminates new capital expenditures, opens up data center space and reduces power and cooling requirements.

    Elastic storage - shared infrastructure allows for infinite scalability. Eliminates forecasting and long procurement cycles.

    Pay as you go and subscription models - purchase capacity with no commitment or reduce costs with longer-term agreements

    Simple to manage industry standard OpenStack and RESTful APIs streamline management integration, freeing resources to accelerate other cloud projects.

    Sample Customers
    Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
    Brinks
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization47%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise51%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is ranked 18th in Public Cloud Storage Services while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is rated 9.4, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud writes "Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is most compared with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Google Cloud Storage.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.