Compare NetApp StorageGRID vs. Quantum ActiveScale

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Quantum ActiveScale? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud.""Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.
Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
5th
Views
4,572
Comparisons
2,888
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
728
Rating
8.5
23rd
Views
3
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Storage GRIDActiveScale, Quantum ActiveScale Object Storage, ActiveScale Object Storage
Learn
NetApp
Quantum
Overview

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

StorNext File System
Increase productivity and reduce time to critical business insights with StorNext® File System. StorNext architecture delivers the necessary performance to get your business moving forward.

Offer
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
Learn more about Quantum ActiveScale
Sample Customers
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 5th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews while Quantum ActiveScale is ranked 23rd in File and Object Storage. NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.6, while Quantum ActiveScale is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". On the other hand, NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, Cloudian HyperStore, MinIO and Scality RING8, whereas Quantum ActiveScale is most compared with .

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.