Compare NetApp StorageGRID vs. Qumulo

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp StorageGRID Logo
4,260 views|2,709 comparisons
Qumulo Logo
5,733 views|4,879 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The speed of the disks removed the bottleneck from our storage.""It helps automate our storage infrastructure.""Right now, we have an older StorageGRID. I like that we can grow it.""It improves our operational efficiency.""It has awesome scalability. We consume it with storage appliance nodes, then we just plug and play as we need more.""The ability to get to the StorageGRID from anywhere on my network. The solution is remote. You don't have to be at a physical location.""The implementation with NetApp went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance.""It has enabled us to save money on storage costs. We removed our tape library."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pros »

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

More Qumulo Pros »

Cons
"The only real issue that we have run into is, when we are cloning, we cannot do a thin provision clone, it has to be a full clone.""It has its quirks here and there, but it is an older NetApp system.""We want to move towards Azure in the cloud. Right now, the system is all physical.""I would like to see them integrate more with the monitoring platforms. It is a bit difficult to get automated monitoring of the system.""The processes around installation and upgrade need improvement.""There was a small amount of confusion when working with StorageGRID and Active Directory for access. We had to do things three to four times resulting in our engineer troubleshooting a couple of things. The location of the menu, along with what is inside the menu: configurations, settings, etc., is not straightforward to users. Most users are Windows-based. So, when make logical changes to the menu which are not similar to Windows, users and administrators get confused.""The redundancy and reliability are great, but I also see room for improvement there. I would like to see more efficiency in the storage and dedupe/compression solutions."

More NetApp StorageGRID Cons »

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

More Qumulo Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is attractive.""We chose NetApp because of price and performance.""While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better.""The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure.""We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service.""Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud.""Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.
Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
Views
4,260
Comparisons
2,709
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
614
Avg. Rating
8.4
13th
Views
5,733
Comparisons
4,879
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
412
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Storage GRID
Learn
NetApp
Qumulo
Overview

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

Real-time analytics are built directly into the Qumulo Scalable File System (QSFS) enabling instant answers about your data footprint, and how it’s being used, at scale.

Built on Linux, Qumulo Core runs on commodity hardware, on dedicated appliances, or in virtual machines providing the ultimate flexibility and cost advantages.

Qumulo Core is optimized for the widest range of workloads and file sizes including transactional and sequential access patterns and small and large files.

Offer
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
Learn more about Qumulo
Sample Customers
ASE, DARZ GmbHUniversity of Washington, Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Zoic Studios, Sinclair Oil, Blind Visual Propaganda, Sportvision, Telus Studios, Ant Farm, Densho, MSG Netowrks, Eight Solutions
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Retailer6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 5 reviews while Qumulo is ranked 13th in File and Object Storage with 1 review. NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.4, while Qumulo is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, Cloudian HyperStore, Scality RING8 and MinIO, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Scality RING8, SoftNAS and Red Hat Ceph Storage.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.