Compare NetApp StorageGRID vs. StackPath Object Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use StackPath Object Storage? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better.""The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure.""We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service.""Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud.""Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."

More NetApp StorageGRID Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.
Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
Views
4,260
Comparisons
2,709
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
614
Avg. Rating
8.4
19th
Views
117
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Also Known As
Storage GRID
Learn
NetApp
StackPath
Overview

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

Why use StackPath Object Storage?
Frequent (hot) storage shouldn’t cost a lot. And once you’re paying for storage, we don’t believe you should pay AGAIN to access it. Welcome to StackPath’s Object Storage.

Save Money
50% cheaper than Amazon S3 or similar cloud storage providers.

No Data Transfer Fees
No charges for data transfer (egress) or API requests/calls.

High Performance
Better performance than cloud storage providers, even more so once paired with StackPath’s CDN or Edge Computing.

Performance
StackPath’s system architecture enables an average 6x faster performance relative to Cloud Storage Providers*. Especially when paired with our CDN or Edge Compute, this performance advantage means significantly faster time-to-first-byte speeds.

S3-Compatible
100% AWS S3 bit-compatible (same AWS API constructs for storage & identity management). No need to change your S3-compatible application.

Superior TTFB
Average time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance of less than 15 ms; made even faster when paired with our CDN. This is significantly lower than others’ TTFB.

Immediate Read Capability
When you write an object to our buckets, it can be read immediately after. This is not always the case with Amazon S3 — a well-known issue for AWS developers.

Offer
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
Learn more about StackPath Object Storage
Sample Customers
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Manufacturing Company17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 4 reviews while StackPath Object Storage is ranked 19th in File and Object Storage. NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.2, while StackPath Object Storage is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". On the other hand, NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, Cloudian HyperStore, Scality RING8 and MinIO, whereas StackPath Object Storage is most compared with MinIO, IBM Cloud Object Storage and Linode Object Storage.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.