We performed a comparison between NetCrunch and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."
"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
Earn 20 points
NetCrunch is ranked 76th in Network Monitoring Software while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. NetCrunch is rated 8.0, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
