We performed a comparison between Netezza Analytics and QueryIO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution."
"Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution."
"Speed contributes to large capacity."
"For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable."
"It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data."
"Anyone who has even a little bit of knowledge of the solution can begin to create things. You don't have to be technical to use the solution."
"The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities."
"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support."
"The Analytics feature should be simplified."
"The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this."
"Disaster recovery support. Because it was an appliance, and if you wanted to support disaster recovery, you needed to buy two."
"Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."
"This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available."
"In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there."
"There needs to be some simplification of the user interface."
Earn 20 points
Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop while QueryIO is ranked 16th in Hadoop. Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4, while QueryIO is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QueryIO writes "Stable with good connectivity and good integration capabilities". Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, whereas QueryIO is most compared with Splice Machine.
See our list of best Hadoop vendors.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
