Neustar Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Neustar Logo
89 views|72 comparisons
Reblaze Logo
460 views|344 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Neustar Web Application Firewall and Reblaze based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Neustar Web Application Firewall?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "On a monthly basis we pay $750."
  • "I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."
  • "There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."
  • "We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."
  • More Reblaze Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.
    Top Answer:We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current… more »
    Top Answer:There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    89
    Comparisons
    72
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    460
    Comparisons
    344
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,144
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Neustar WAF
    Learn More
    Overview

    Neustar Web Application Firewall (WAF) and SiteProtect Next Generation provide a true cloud-based Always-On approach to quickly stop the largest DDoS and most sophisticated web application threats without reducing network performance or adding additional levels of complexity to your existing security strategies. Because we are vendor agnostic, our easy-to-use online portal will give you visibility into the latest threats across all of your applications – regardless of where they are hosted, along with the expertise to adapt to shifting tactics and ever changing attack vectors. Our global scale and 15+ years of web security experience provide you inherent advantages when defending against many of today’s most rampant online threats.

    Reblaze is a cloud-based, fully managed protective shield for sites and web applications. Hostile traffic is blocked in the cloud, before it reaches the protected network.

    Reblaze is a comprehensive web security solution, providing a next-gen WAF, DoS and DDoS protection, bot mitigation, scraping prevention, CDN, load balancing, and more.

    The platform offers a unique combination of benefits. Machine learning provides accurate, adaptive threat detection. Dedicated Virtual Private Clouds ensure maximum privacy. Top-tier infrastructure assures maximum performance. Fine-grained ACLs enable precise traffic regulation. An intuitive web-based management console provides real-time traffic control. A one-month trial offer allows you to assess Reblaze with no cost, risk, or obligation.

    Reblaze makes it effortless and affordable to secure and accelerate your web assets. Organizations from many vertical markets around the globe are benefiting from Reblaze's highly scalable WAF/IDS, DDoS, anti-scraping and Bot mitigation service.

    Sample Customers
    Google, TESCO, permanent tsb, ticketmaster, Pinterest, Cinepolis, Allstate, DOLLAR TREE
    eBay, AirAsia, Taboola, Reebonz, IAI, Payoneer, mySupermarket, William Hill, Fanduel
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Media Company8%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Neustar Web Application Firewall is ranked 52nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Reblaze is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews. Neustar Web Application Firewall is rated 0.0, while Reblaze is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Reblaze writes "Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks". Neustar Web Application Firewall is most compared with , whereas Reblaze is most compared with Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, F5 Advanced WAF, Radware Alteon and AWS WAF.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.