We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The most valuable feature is automation."
"Nexthink's best features are Engage and Act, which we use in combination for self-healing use cases."
"I like everything about this product."
"Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days."
"In the past two years, the biggest benefit is that we have been able to identify 57,000-plus defects. These are possible tickets that we are preventing by using Nexthink."
"Nexthink saves a lot of time for the technicians who work on the troubleshooting side...Nexthink provides its users with a very good point of overview and presentation."
"Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%."
"It is useful for managing end-user devices. The insights and the data that you get from end-user devices are most valuable."
"I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"The stability of this solution could be greatly improved to avoid performance issues."
"We would like better connectivity with SCCM for on-premises infrastructure and autopilot for cloud deployment."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"We have provided them feedback on a few changes we would like to see with how alerting can work. Rather than have somebody looking at the network, if network utilization goes above a certain point, it would be helpful if the solution issued an alert to the right people."
"I would like it if they could put in some patch deployments and compliances."
"They were having some limitations on the number of alerts that you can generate. This definitely needs to be increased."
"The solution could provide more training. There should be proper documentation on the solution because even for small issues we have needed to reach out to the support team. The person who is doing all the administration work should have the proper information, but the problem is the documentation is lacking. There is no proper training or documentation available. Nexthink is holding all the information. We want to learn, but you can not without the information."
"Nexthink could have better integration with ITSM tools - at the moment, they only integrate with ServiceNow, so adding other tools, like HP SMAX, would be very useful."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews while Nexthink is ranked 1st in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 20 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , Liquidware Stratusphere UX and ConnectWise Automate.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.