We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall."
"The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found."
"WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall."
"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"I like the concept of self-service, that I can do everything on my own."
"The product offers high availability."
"The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary."
"Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time."
"It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput."
"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly."
"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:
NGINX App Protect offers:
NGINX App Protect is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. NGINX App Protect is rated 8.0, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Imperva Incapsula. See our NGINX App Protect vs. Radware AppWall report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.