Compare NGINX App Protect vs. Radware AppWall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NGINX App Protect vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.""The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.""WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall."

More NGINX App Protect Pros »

"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable.""Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure.""I like the concept of self-service, that I can do everything on my own.""The product offers high availability."

More Radware AppWall Pros »

Cons
"The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.""Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time.""It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput."

More NGINX App Protect Cons »

"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly.""Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers.""You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."

More Radware AppWall Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.""Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."

More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.
Top Answer: Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year. We pay on an annual basis. We just have our operating costs on top of that.
Top Answer: The solution does well when there's low throughput but when we go for any high throughput, it's always a challenge. I'm expecting the next version to have a better high throughput. I also find that… more »
Top Answer: For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc. 
Top Answer: The product offers high availability.
Top Answer: With a good configuration and a good understanding of the application, you can have very good integration with the web application firewall and Radware application. However, it isn't easy. We need to… more »
Ranking
Views
3,086
Comparisons
2,572
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.0
Views
1,460
Comparisons
1,142
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
530
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn More
Overview

NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

  • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
  • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
  • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
  • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

NGINX App Protect offers:

  • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
  • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
  • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
  • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
  • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
  • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
  • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
  • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
  • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
  • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security
AppWall - Radware's Web Application Firewall (WAF), ensures fast, reliable and secure delivery of mission-critical Web applications for corporate networks and in the cloud. AppWall is an ICSA Labs certified and PCI compliant WAF that combines positive and negative security models to provide complete protection against web application attacks, web application attacks behind CDNs, API manipulations, advanced HTTP attacks (slowloris, dynamic floods), brute force attacks on login pages and more.
Offer
Learn more about NGINX App Protect
Learn more about Radware AppWall
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Accuview.com, Ace, ADP, BuyPass, Computershare, DTCC, Firehost, Garanti, HP, Konami, Mohawk, SeatPG, Telenet
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company5%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company21%
Insurance Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about NGINX App Protect vs. Radware AppWall and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NGINX App Protect is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. NGINX App Protect is rated 8.0, while Radware AppWall is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Imperva Incapsula. See our NGINX App Protect vs. Radware AppWall report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.