We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:
NGINX App Protect offers:
NGINX App Protect is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while Sucuri is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX App Protect is rated 8.0, while Sucuri is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door and Imperva Incapsula, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, SiteLock, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Comodo cWatch.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.